F. Daniel (Dan) Davis, PhD, Associate Chief, Clinical Ethics

• Recognize Geisinger’s efforts to formulate learner-focused “standards of professionalism” within the relevant historical/conceptual context, i.e., the contemporary “professionalism movement” inaugurated in the mid- to late 1980s;
• Describe the “structure” of Geisinger’s newly formulated standards of professionalism, i.e., professionalism is “lived out” in three relationships: (1) one’s relationship with oneself as a health care professional, (2) one’s relationship with one’s patients and one’s colleagues, and (3) one’s relationship with the community, and more broadly, society;
• Begin to reckon with the implications of these newly formulated “standards of professionalism” for pedagogy, i.e., curricular and faculty development in medical education

Disclosure of Relevant Financial Relationships with/without Commercial Interests

The Planning Committee consisting of Mark Olaf, DO and Kendra Boell, DO have nothing to disclose.
CE Committee Members/Content Reviewers have nothing to disclose.
F. Daniel (Dan) Davis, PhD has nothing to disclose.

Any/All relevant financial relationships have been mitigated.

Content Disclosure
I/we are acknowledging that this presentation and/or content is HIPAA compliant.